Teaching quality, the problem of innovation, teaching in turbulent times, and more


Around the Web

I'm busy leading lots and lots of faculty learning communities, so I'll keep this week's newsletter short and sweet. Here are a few items of interest around the web that I think readers might find interesting.

  • Behind the Curtain of Higher Education: Faculty Aren't Trained - This Forbes essay by San Francisco Bay University president Nick Ladany has been lighting up my little section of LinkedIn. Ladany points out something that many of us in higher ed know well, that training and support and standards for teaching are not always priorities, especially at research universities. I really liked this part: "Professors are then left to instruct as they see fit, often under the vague umbrella of academic freedom. Imagine if we applied the same approach to training surgeons: study biology, then perform surgeries as you wish, under the guise of 'medical freedom.'" I'm really glad to see this message about whether and how colleagues really value in a venue like Forbes, where it might attract some useful attention.

    Two caveats, however: One is that Ladany claims there are no "standardized definition[s] of what effective teaching looks like," which is incorrect. See my recent podcast interview with Lindsay Masland for one of many such definitions now in operation in higher ed. My second caveat is what Trey Conaster of the University of Kentucky pointed out in this LinkedIn thread, that were centers for teaching to be given formal oversight roles in teaching as Ladany recommends, that would dramatically change faculty relationships with centers, likely for the worse.
  • Dialog(ue)s on Teaching - Stacey Margarita Johnson and Lance Eaton met each other on the "take it or leave it" podcast episode I aired this summer, and they've been corresponding ever since about issues of teaching and learning and technology in higher education. They've taken that correspondence public in a series of posts on their respective blogs, and their conversation is well worth reading. Start with Stacey's post "We Need Less Innovation," then read Lance reply at "innovation vs. Innovation," then read Stacey's latest "We Need More Connection." These posts are so good, and I'm thrilled I played a part in bringing these two amazing people together.
  • New Teaching Hub Collections - Part of my role at the University of Virginia Center for Teaching is serving as an editor for Teaching Hub, a website featuring curated collections of resources on all kinds of teaching and learning topics. I'm excited to share two new Teaching Hub collections: Teaching in Turbulent Times, a set of resources curated by Rick Moore from Washington University in St. Louis featuring strategies for supporting students when events in the world intrude on events in the classroom, and Using Our Non-Content Words from my UVA colleague Lynn Mandeltort about using "instructor talk" to help students feel connected and engage with each other intellectually. Thanks to Rick and Lynn for putting these very useful collections together.

Thanks for reading!

If you found this newsletter useful, please forward it to a colleague who might like it! That's one of the best ways you can support the work I'm doing here at Intentional Teaching.

Or consider supporting Intentional Teaching through Patreon. For just $3 US per month, you can help defray production costs for the podcast and newsletter and you get access to Patreon-only interviews and bonus clips.

Intentional Teaching with Derek Bruff

Welcome to the Intentional Teaching newsletter! I'm Derek Bruff, educator and author. The name of this newsletter is a reminder that we should be intentional in how we teach, but also in how we develop as teachers over time. I hope this newsletter will be a valuable part of your professional development as an educator.

Read more from Intentional Teaching with Derek Bruff

On the Sensibility of Cognitive Outsourcing You may have seen a headline or two about that new MIT Media Lab study "Your Brain on ChatGPT." This is the study in which more than 50 participants wrote SAT essays either with ChatGPT or with Google search (but no AI assistance) or with just their brains. The researchers took electroencephalography (EEG) measures of the participants and concluded that the ChatGPT cohort didn't have the same brain connectivity seen in the other two groups. The...

Take It or Leave It with Stacey Johnson, Liz Norell, and Viji Sathy We're back with another "Take It or Leave It" panel on the podcast this week. I know it's only been a couple of episodes since the last one, but there's a lot happening in U.S. higher ed right now, and I find these panels helpful for making sense of it all. Once again I’ve invited three smart colleagues on the show to discuss recent op-eds that address the challenges that colleges and universities and their teaching missions...

Teaching with AI Agents: A Conversation about Cogniti I think the first custom AI chatbot I tried was one called “Are You a Witch?” designed by past podcast guest Marc Watkins. This chatbot would answer your questions like ChatGPT, but unlike ChatGPT it would only do so after accusing you of witchcraft (in the most caricatured way possible) and making you solve a riddle. That chatbot was kind of silly, but I soon heard about faculty and other instructors building chatbots to do all kinds of...