Years ago I was involved in a project at Vanderbilt University to offer less commonly taught languages to our students. Vanderbilt partnered with Duke University and the University of Virginia to offer online courses in languages like Kʼicheʼ Mayan and Tibetan. These are language courses that wouldn’t make at any single campus, but across the three institutions there was sufficient interest to run the courses.
At the time, the big challenge with these courses was making synchronous class sessions possible when students were split among three different campuses. This was well before the pandemic and the rise of Zoom for this kind of teaching. In fact, after a few years battling the telepresence technology used in this initiative, the instructors moved their classes to Zoom, and these were maybe the first Zoom classes I heard about.
Not only did this initiative pool student interest in these less commonly taught languages, it also pooled instructional resources. We didn't have anyone on the faculty at Vanderbilt who could teach Tibetan, but one of our partner schools did, so the project meant we could offer those courses to our students. Even at relatively large research universities, there are only so many subjects that a faculty body can teach.
I started thinking a lot about this old project when I learned about the work of Rize Education. Rize is a for-profit company that works with a consortium of over 135 colleges and universities to help them quickly launch new, career-oriented majors and other programs. This group is called the Lower Cost Models for Independent Colleges Consortium, or LCMC for short, and it consists largely of small liberal arts colleges.
LCMC institutions are schools that might have trouble starting up new majors in data analytics or digital marketing or public health. There are, after all, only so many subjects that a faculty body can teach, especially when that body is relatively small. The LCMC partners with Rize, which can provide half a dozen core online courses for these majors, sourced from the consortium, that layer on existing courses at the home institution to get these new programs up and running in a semester or two.
The institutions Rize is working with are often small and heavily dependent on tuition. They have an existential need to continue enrolling sufficient students, and that means offering majors that students want. Vanderbilt wasn't going to lose many students by not offering Tibetan, but these small colleges can't afford to have many students turn them down for lack of major options.
Does this consortium model offer a way forward for small institutions? That remains to be seen, but this week on the Intentional Teaching podcast I talk with Greg Edwards, head of learning at Rize Education. We don't get much into the economics of the consortium model, but we do talk a lot about the challenge of designing online courses that meet the needs of multiple colleges within the consortium and that prepare students for career success.
To listen to our conversation, search for "Intentional Teaching" in your podcast app or listen on the podcast website. And if you have thoughts about this consortium approach or the larger question of preparing students for a changing workplace, I would love to hear them.
Over on my Agile Learning blog, I started my coverage of the 2023 POD Network conference with a couple of ideas for using generative AI in teaching and learning. POD stands for Professional and Organizational Development, and it’s the big professional society in North America for teaching center staff like me. POD held its annual conference in Pittsburgh last month, and it was great seeing old colleagues and friends I hadn't seen in person since my 2019 conference attendance.
The concurrent sessions at the conference were fantastic this year, with lots of tough choices in each time slot about which session to attend. I felt obliged to attend at least one session on generative AI, and I picked a good one. The session was titled “Forecasting How AI Could Change the Work of Teaching Centers,” and it was facilitated by Marc Ebenfield and Karl Carrigan from the University of New England. They took a futurist approach to the topic, walking us through a tool called signals and drivers to hep us imagine possible futures for AI in education.
Our discussion of future possibilities was interesting, but on my blog this week I shared a couple of possibilities raised during the session that are already here. You can read about course-level GPTs and learn about one that's currently available via Top Hat, and you can see my experiment with using ChatGPT to summarize responses to an open-ended polling question, something I'll try live during the next workshop I facilitate! Expect to see helpful(?) AI assistants in your favorite polling software very soon.
This is the part of the newsletter where I link to things that I find interesting in the hopes that you do, too.
If you found this newsletter useful, please forward it to a colleague who might like it! That's one of the best ways you can support the work I'm doing here at Intentional Teaching.
Or consider supporting Intentional Teaching through Patreon. For just $3 US per month, you get access to bonus podcast content, Patreon-only teaching resources (like a guide to using audio assignments in your courses), an archive of past newsletters, and a community of intentional educators. Patreon supporters also get 20% off my book, Intentional Tech: Principles to Guide the Use of Educational Technology in College Teaching, when they order from West Virginia University Press.
Welcome to the Intentional Teaching newsletter! I'm Derek Bruff, educator and author. The name of this newsletter is a reminder that we should be intentional in how we teach, but also in how we develop as teachers over time. I hope this newsletter will be a valuable part of your professional development as an educator.
Around the Web This is the part of the newsletter where I link to things that I find interesting in the hopes that you do, too. This week, this is the entire newsletter! Education as the Lighting of a Fire: Personal Connection Strikes the Match - This is a preprint of a study by Steven Most and Nathan Clout of the University of New South Wales Sydney. Two groups of participants heard the same recorded lecture. One group was given a "relatable" backstory about the lecturer, the other was told...
How well do you know the law as it applies to teaching? This week on the podcast, I talk with Kent Kauffman, author of Navigating Choppy Waters: Key Legal Issues College Faculty Need to Know. I invited him on the show because of all the stories we've seen in the last year about college and university faculty being accused by students of teaching something the student didn't the instructor should be teaching. These incidents have a lot of instructors worried about teaching controversial...
Learning How to Learn (with AI, Actually) I wrote the first draft of the “Using AI as a Tutor” chapter in the forthcoming Norton Guide to AI-Aware Teaching, co-authored with Annette Vee and Marc Watkins. I pitched this chapter for the book because I was brought into the author team as the “STEM guy,” that is, a co-author who could bring some STEM education perspectives to the work, and because the number one use case of generative AI in STEM education that I hear about is students turning to...